A couple from Bloubergstrand, aged 47 and 48, stands accused of heinous crimes including sexual abuse, child pornography, and sexual grooming involving their two daughters, aged three and eight.
As the legal process unfolds, prosecutors are engaged in a fierce battle to withhold explicit evidence to safeguard the vulnerable children while the investigation continues.
During an interlocutory hearing at the Cape Town Magistrates’ Court on Thursday, 26 June, the couple’s defence lawyer, William Booth, argued for full access to the State’s evidence, claiming it was essential for preparing their clients’ bail application.
However, prosecutors are raising serious objections, emphasising the need to protect the integrity of the investigation as well as the emotional wellbeing of the children involved.
State prosecutor Claire Smidt presented a powerful case against granting access to parents accused of crimes so severe that disclosing evidence could exacerbate the trauma experienced by the minors.
Smidt stated in court that the explicit sexual nature of these 25 counts precludes us from presenting copies of such images and videos. ‘Our duty to safeguard the interests of the children is paramount,’ as reported by Daily Maverick.
The case revolves around allegations that the couple committed their atrocious acts over a prolonged period from 2020 to April 2025. With the possibility of more charges being added as forensic evidence becomes accessible, the State’s position is that revealing details could jeopardise the ongoing investigation.
While Magistrate Alida Theart confirmed that the couple’s court appearance fell within the prescribed 48-hour period following their arrest, the defence lawyer questioned the lengthy elapsed time since the couple’s apprehension, highlighting the unclear status of charges against them.
The charge sheet reportedly submitted contains minimal information, prompting Booth’s request for a more detailed disclosure from the prosecution.
Despite Booth’s concerns, Smidt reiterated the State’s commitment to fairness, assuring the court that their eventual proceedings would allow the accused to present their defence but within the context of safeguarding vulnerable victims. With the court yet to decide on the matter, it is expected that a ruling will be made on 2 July regarding the defence’s request for evidence.
Also read:
Picture: Supplied
