Alleged underworld figure Mark Lifman is pursuing the R6.5 million home of Randolf Jorberg, the former owner of the popular Long Street eatery Beerhouse, Cape {town} Etc reports.
Also read: Wildlife trafficker sentenced to six years and slapped with a R100k fine
Jorberg previously claimed that Lifman was responsible for the closure of his establishment.
In August, Lifman issued a letter of demand to Jorberg, accusing him of making defamatory public statements. Jorberg had been vocal about the difficulties his business faced, particularly citing the impact of extortion rings, and he made allegations against Lifman during interviews, including one with the investigative show Carte Blanche. He claimed Lifman was involved in a local protection racket, stating, ‘Mark Lifman must pay for his crimes,’ which Lifman’s attorney argued wrongly implied Lifman’s guilt and harmed his reputation.
Check out these budget-friendly offers under R100 000 and cruise through Cape Town in style. Find car listings.
Jorberg has not retracted his statement or apologised, instead responding with a message to Lifman that read, ‘Let the party begin. Rather communicate directly with me if you got something to discuss.’
For years, Jorberg has criticised the influence of extortion and protection rackets on businesses, mentioning that some demanded R20 000 in protection fees. In response to the situation, Lifman sought an urgent ex parte order from the Western Cape High Court to attach Jorberg’s property in Green Point, allowing for legal action while Jorberg resides overseas.
An ex parte order permits one party to seek urgent relief without notifying the other, showcasing Lifman’s legal strategy. The court’s decision to grant this order significantly impacts Jorberg’s property rights, as it restricts his ability to sell or mortgage the home until the matter is resolved. Lifman’s actions could also lead to financial liabilities if he pursues claims for damages.
In response, Jorberg stated, ‘Lifman is trying to destroy me by taking my last remaining asset,’ adding that he has struggled to find a pro bono lawyer despite his public call for assistance. He mentioned he would need to crowdsource his defence and the statement needed for a strong criminal case against Lifman.
Lifman’s attorney, Michael Strauss, asserted that Lifman has the right to protect his dignity and reputation. He indicated that further legal action against Jorberg would follow, particularly since Jorberg has repeated his allegations on a blog.
Jorberg has options for contesting the court’s decision, including filing to lift the property attachment, arguing that it was unjustified, or challenging Lifman’s claims by providing evidence that counters Lifman’s assertions.
Cape {town} Etc discount: Looking for things to do in the city, at half the price?
Also read:
Picture: Beerhouse / Facebook
