The ongoing debate surrounding the City of Cape Town’s controversial R120 million N2 wall project has intensified following comments from the Acting Minister of Police, Firoz Cachalia.
In a striking contradiction to the local government’s rationale for the expenditure, Cachalia states that the wall will not effectively curb crime along the notorious corridor, reports Cape {town} Etc.
This revelation comes in response to a parliamentary question posed by the Build One South Africa (BOSA) party, represented by Spokesperson Roger Solomons.
Cachalia’s written response highlights a critical point: the South African Police Service (SAPS) does not view the proposed wall as a viable alternative to comprehensive policing efforts.
‘While the construction of a highway wall may contribute to situational crime prevention, infrastructure interventions cannot replace core policing functions,’ stated Cachalia.
The Minister further elaborated that the construction of a barrier will not tackle issues such as organized criminal activities, gang violence, or firearm-related offences that extend beyond the immediate roadside area.
This perspective significantly opposes the City of Cape Town’s repeated assertions that the wall would become a meaningful deterrent against crime, particularly in an area heavily trafficked by individuals commuting between the airport and the city.
In a sharp response, Solomons argued that Cachalia’s statements effectively undermine the justification for such a substantial financial commitment. ‘This contradiction exposes the fundamental problem with the project,’ Solomons remarked, asserting that the wall is merely a superficial intervention rather than a genuine strategy for crime reduction.
As the debate continues, the implications of the construction project are being scrutinized, particularly its potential to evoke the spatial divisions associated with South Africa’s apartheid past.
Critics have voiced concerns that this initiative could symbolically reinforce divisions within communities, potentially shielding urban inequality from view rather than addressing the underlying socioeconomic issues.
‘Crime cannot be walled away, and South Africa cannot build barriers high enough to hide the reality of poverty and inequality,’ Solomons cautioned.
He emphasised the need for effective policing and investment in community resources to foster real safety rather than relying on physical barriers that merely obscure deeper problems.
Adding to the momentum of dissent, Brett Herron, a member of the GOOD party and the Western Cape Provincial Parliament, condemned the project’s legitimacy.
He accused Cape Town’s Mayor, Geordin Hill-Lewis, of political posturing ahead of elections, suggesting that the mayor’s claims of engagement with relevant authorities are unfounded.
‘When the Mayor included the wall in the adjustment budget tabled in Council in January, he described it as stretching from the Baden Powell Road intersection to Bhunga Avenue. That stretch of the N2 is almost entirely owned and under the authority of the Western Cape Provincial Government,’ Herron explained.
Herron also pointed out discrepancies in the funding allocations, noting that R107 million is earmarked for the project only in the 2027/28 financial year, raising questions about the urgency and feasibility of the undertaking.
‘The R114 million that the Mayor has miraculously conjured for the project without taking the most basic step of engaging the landowner for permission would be better spent and more effective in changing living conditions conducive to crime by investing in upgrading the very communities they’d like to wall in,’ he concluded.
Be the first to know – Join our WhatsApp Channel for content worth tapping into! Click here to join!
Also read:
Critics say Cape Town’s R114m N2 wall hides poverty, not crime
Picture: @zizipho5ø / X
