Advocate Annade Theart-Hofmeyr presented June Steenkamp’s victim impact statement at Oscar Pistorius’s parole hearing at the Atteridgeville prison today.
In her statement, June Steenkamp reflects on her daughter Reeva’s life and the impact of her death. She recalls Reeva as a miracle child, born despite medical predictions to the contrary.
Steenkamp reveals that Reeva was a skilled equestrian and later became a model, using her public profile to support victims of domestic abuse and rape. She says that, while Reeva’s name continues to raise awareness of gender-based violence, her own dreams and those of her daughter were unfulfilled due to her premature death.
Also read: Convicted murderer Oscar Pistorius faces parole hearing this Friday
She said her decision not to attend Pistorius’s parole hearing was due to emotional exhaustion and described her process of forgiving Pistorius to survive the ordeal. However, she expressed scepticism about Pistorius’s version of the events leading to Reeva’s death and his rehabilitation in prison.
She doubts his remorse and rehabilitation, emphasising the importance of acknowledging the truth of his actions for genuine remorse, and concludes by expressing her hope that parole decisions prioritise women’s safety and that the parole board carefully considers Pistorius’s engagement with the truth in their decision.
As per TimesLive, here is June Steenkamp’s statement in full:
‘At the time of writing this victim impact statement, my memories go back to when my beautiful daughter Reeva Rebecca Steenkamp was born. Reeva was born a miracle; she entered our lives after medical experts predicted I would have difficulty conceiving after a miscarriage. Barry and I had big dreams for Reeva.
From a young age, she became a skilful equestrian and liked nothing better than helping Barry who managed stables and trained racing horses. From a young age, she had the ability to light up a room with her presence. When she fell off a horse at the age of 20 and had to spend months recovering, she decided to become a model and use her public profile to garner support for victims of domestic abuse and rape.
It has taken me the best part of 10 years to come to realise that Reeva appeared to have fulfilled her destiny during her life and more abundantly so, in her tragic death. Reeva’s name and her demise continue to raise awareness around gender-based violence worldwide.
But did Reeva fulfil her dreams? I know she did not. Shortly before she died, she started discussing marriage and having children one day as part of her dream. At 29 she was certainly mature enough and would have made a wonderful wife and mother.
Were our dreams for Reeva fulfilled? Of course not. We realised we were blessed as our daughter left us memories we could only be proud of. The huge hole left in our future, can never be filled by anyone else.
Recently, our family suffered a further blow. It is probably known that my dear husband Barry suffered a stroke two months after the murder trial began, when he was confronted with more headlines while reading the newspaper. Reeva was a real daddy’s girl and he was a doting father. She made an effort to sustain a strong relationship with us both and used to telephone her father on a Saturday and me on a Sunday. I have no doubt that Barry died of a broken heart. No parent should have to bury a child and most certainly not in the circumstances that prevailed in the demise of Reeva.
After Reeva’s death, Barry and I, both devastated, tried with whatever emotional reserves that remained to take care and support one another. And then the unthinkable happened: Barry passed away on September 14 2023. What he meant in my life and the extent of his support have now crystallised into what remains after: a bottomless black hole of pain and loneliness. I miss my partner and confidant dearly. That he is reunited with Reeva offers some respite, but does not ease the terrific sense of loss I have to come to terms with.
I am not attending Oscar’s parole hearing as I simply cannot muster the energy to face him again. Barry’s death has opened the wounds in many ways caused by Reeva’s death. I had forgiven Oscar long ago, as I knew almost instantly I would not be able to survive if I had to cling to my anger.
I do not believe Oscar’s version that he thought the person in the toilet was a burglar. I do not know anybody who does. My dearest child screamed for her life; loud enough for the neighbours to hear her. I do not know what gave rise to his choice to shoot through a closed door four times with hollow-point ammunition when, I believe, he knew it was Reeva.
Messages sent to us by Reeva highlight he has huge anger issues.
Reeva’s messages were read out in court by Francois Moller of the Hawks, obtained from Pistorius’ and Reeva’s cellphones. After a fight between Reeva and Oscar on January 27 2013, Reeva wrote: ‘I’m scared of you sometimes and how you snap at me and of how you will react to me’.
‘I’m the girl who fell in love with you but I’m also the girl who gets sidestepped when you are in a sh-t mood … I get snapped at and told my accent and voices are annoying’.
‘I was not flirting with anyone today. I feel sick that you should suggest it,’ adding he messed up ‘a special day for me by throwing a tantrum’.
‘You do everything to throw tantrums in front of people.’
In 2009 a case of assault was opened at Boschkop police station for the assault of Cassidy Taylor Memmory. The victim required surgery to her ankle.
Oscar’s girlfriend before Reeva, Samantha Taylor, described similar behaviour by Oscar: throwing tantrums, physical and emotional abuse — all of which were fully described in the book published by her mother.
I do not know which rehabilitation programmes were attended by Oscar while incarcerated, but I sincerely hope his rehabilitation included psychotherapy to deal with his temper and abusive behaviour towards women. I also hope specialist criminologists were engaged to assist in compiling a psychological profile that would assist in determining his risk for recidivism [tendency of a prisoner to reoffend].
I am not convinced that Oscar has been rehabilitated.
Rehabilitation requires someone to engage honestly with the full truth of his crime and the consequences thereof. Nobody can claim to have remorse if they are not able to engage fully with the truth. If someone does not show remorse, they cannot be rehabilitated.
If they are not rehabilitated, their risk of recidivism is high. I am informed an inmate’s remorse and the extent to which they are rehabilitated are taken into consideration at the time of making a parole decision.
It is my earnest wish that no-one should be subjected to gender-based violence. I hope the parole board panel will evaluate the inmate’s rehabilitation by considering his engagement with the truth in determining the presence or absence of remorse.
My dear Barry left this world utterly devastated by the thought that he had failed to protect his daughter and therefore failed in his role as father, as he perceived it. The only hope he had left was that Oscar would find it in himself to eventually tell the full truth.
It is my hope that parole decisions treat the safety of women as the most important consideration by exercising their power judiciously.
The pain caused by the dastardly murder of Reeva did not only include emotional trauma. It also included trauma that manifested physically as became evident in the accelerated deterioration in health for Barry and myself.
When Reeva died, I was a ‘young’ 67 and Barry was 70 years old. I can confirm our lives were gravely affected — physically, emotionally and financially.
Should it be decided that Oscar is sufficiently rehabilitated, it is my wish that the parole policies and procedures of the department of correctional services be applied consistently in his release.’
Also read:
Oscar Pistorius pursues parole release through Constitutional Court appeal