The future of one of Sea Point’s most closely watched public properties is once again under the spotlight, with the City of Cape Town and the Western Cape Government required to account for their affordable housing plans, Cape {town} Etc reports.
Cape Argus reported that the two authorities reached a court-ordered deadline on Friday, 2 October 2026, to provide the Western Cape High Court with reports on their housing policies and programmes.
The reports follow a landmark Constitutional Court ruling in July, which found that the authorities had failed to adequately address the need for affordable housing in well-located parts of Cape Town.
For residents and housing activists, the issue goes beyond what happens to one piece of land. It raises a much bigger question: who gets to live close to Cape Town’s jobs, transport links and public amenities?
Why Tafelberg matters
The Tafelberg property on Sea Point’s Main Road has been at the centre of a legal battle for more than a decade.
The site was sold for R135 million to the Phyllis Jowell Jewish Day School in 2015, when Helen Zille was Western Cape premier. Housing organisations later challenged the decision, arguing that publicly owned land in such a well-connected area should be considered for social housing.
The Constitutional Court ultimately declared the sale unlawful.
The court also found that the provincial government had not properly consulted the national Minister of Human Settlements before moving ahead with the disposal of the property. It further found shortcomings in public participation around the decision.
That ruling has now shifted the focus from the original sale to what government plans to do about affordable housing in central parts of the city.
A bigger issue than one Sea Point site
Cape Town’s housing debate has long been tied to the legacy of apartheid-era spatial planning.
Many lower-income households live further from the city’s economic centres, while areas such as Sea Point and the CBD offer closer access to employment, public transport, schools, healthcare and other amenities.
The Constitutional Court said the location of housing cannot be treated as an afterthought when government considers whether it is meeting its constitutional housing obligations.
That makes the Tafelberg case significant beyond Sea Point.
The court has ordered the City and province to provide information about affordable housing projects that have already been completed, are being built or are still being considered. Their reports must also account for the resources being allocated to these programmes.
Activists want more homes in well-located areas
Ndifuna Ukwazi, which has been involved in the legal battle alongside Reclaim the City, continues to push for social housing at Tafelberg.
The organisation says assessments of the property indicated that around 250 social housing units could be accommodated. That figure was later reduced to about 200 following concerns around the site’s impact on views.
For the organisation, the debate is not simply about how many homes can fit on the property. It is also about whether public land in well-located areas is being used to address Cape Town’s deep spatial inequalities.
Ndifuna Ukwazi has also warned that the shortage of funding for social housing could make it difficult to turn plans for Tafelberg and other public sites into reality.
The group has called for increased national funding for social housing, as well as action to address governance challenges affecting the Social Housing Regulatory Authority.
What happens next?
The City has said it is finalising its submission in response to the court order, while the Western Cape Government has confirmed that it will submit its required report within the prescribed timeframe.
The reports could therefore become an important measure of how seriously government intends to pursue affordable housing in areas traditionally out of reach for many lower-income residents.
For Cape Town, the Tafelberg debate has become about more than an empty site in Sea Point. It is now part of a much broader conversation about whether the city can create housing opportunities closer to where people work, study and access essential services.
After years of legal battles, the question is no longer only what happened to the Tafelberg property.
It is what happens next – and whether the court ruling will translate into more affordable homes in the heart of Cape Town.
Be the first to know – Join our WhatsApp Channel for content worth tapping into! Click here to join!
Also read:
Picture: Mimi / Pexels
